Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 1 Top 10 SNPs according to IFs for the full data analysis resembling the “truth” (IFfull) in decreasing order

From: A multivariable approach for risk markers from pooled molecular data with only partial overlap

SNP

blackIF full

blackIF red

blackIF part

p-value

rs7039441

0.68

0.65

0.55

0.05

rs1323398

0.55

0.63

0.49

0.02

rs3793482

0.44

0.39

0.36

0.02

rs1048251

0.38

0.27

0.40

0.09

rs10965030

0.28

0.18

0.18

0.07

rs10491695

0.25

0.50

0.50

0.26

rs3750417

0.22

0.10

0.09

0.06

rs7846927

0.21

0.12

0.19

0.05

rs6477107

0.19

0.21

0.24

0.02

rs12684584

0.19

0.21

0.18

0.34

  1. SNP present in both studies
  2. ✘ SNP present in the large study (study A) but not in the white✘ small study (study B)
  3. We additionally report the respective IFs from the reduced (IFred) and partial analysis (IFpart). Numbers are marked in bold if the IF of the (reduced or partial) analysis is smaller than that of the full analysis (IF<IFfull) and in italics if it is greater (IF>IFfull). In 13 cases, we have IF<IFfull, in 7 we have IF>IFfull. We further report p-values from univariate logistic regression for each SNP